Tim, I had to rewrite the comment because YouTube deleted it. Probably because they’d call it misinformation.
Anyway, note the username.
Okay. The whole double slit experiment thing perfectly demonstrates how mainstream science is incorrect when it comes to the Standard Model.
They believe that particles are made up of pieces of matter comprised of many other pieces of matter yet they call it “fundamental.” No. It would be comprised of “one” fundamental piece of matter unique from all others. They go on to believe that “election’s” orbit this matter and the number of these gives the particle it’s properties. Again, incorrect. Something spinning around something isn’t going to create something unique.
Because they realized that light seems to be both, they created the double slit experiment so they could determine whether light was a particle or a wave. But, their misunderstanding of what light is is only compounded by the experiment’s results.
They believe that “observation” magically bestows physical characteristics to matter. On its face this is rediculous. They’ve created a whole new science called Quantum Mechanics eith a bunch of theories and explanations made to fit their failure to understand why the particle, demonstrates an “interference pattern” on the wall behind the two slits. (Proving its a wave) And, why they cant seem to predict where this “change” is going to occur. (Uncertainty principle.)
I have a blog site “thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com” where i get into some of this. My theories are based on the work of a Mr. David LaPoint who once ran a plasma research lab in Canada experimenting with “plasma structures in vacuum.” David made some didcoveries during these experiments and created a video series called “The Primer Fields.” A sort of “video” research paper.
Peer reviee is the strongest testiment to any theory and with today’s internet, believe, these findings have been challenged harshly. And successfully defended i might add.
Particles of matter, (including light) ARE indeed fundamental in nature. Comprised of only one thing. Energy. Particles are understood to be “concentrations of Energy.”
What gives any particle its characteristic’s are how dense the energy is, the size of the particles structure, and its related magnetic field. A particle of solid matter, let’s say, Carbon. Would have a large very dense structure and a very small or weak magnetic field. This would cause it to bump into everything if it had the momentum to do so, thus slowing it down and causing it to easentially “rest “
Light on the other hand would bump into virtually nothing* as the concentration of energy (COE) is an extremely small structure that is not dense at all and has a very large magnetic field.
More information on this can be found at my site in the primer fields catagory.
The reason the double slit experiment is so controversial in my opinion is because it completely validates their hypothesis (Not.) (since they literally made the results fit their theories.)
(*)I said a moment ago that light would bump into virtually nothing. Thats not exacly correctsince we know that it can and will bounce off of surfaces (reflection) can be diverted (refraction) and will interfere even with itself. The statement was to simply illistrate a point.
The reason mainstream science came up with the uncertainty principle is because they cant predict where a particle is at any given time even if they just fired it themselves. My theories however, explain this.
“As the particle travels through the slits it does in fact interfere with itself thus changing it’s direction based on its frequency, sending it to “hit the wall” in the places characteristic of said frequency. (Different freauency, different magnetic field, different interference pattern.)
The reason they cant predict anything is because they fail to realise that when their detector’s come into contact eith the field the entire COE forms at that spot essentially causing the particle to be observed somewhere they didnt expect.
They think that the contact with the field should change the particles direction like it bounced ehen contacting the field. (doesnt work that way.)
Anyway…
I could go on for days. As it is though, this comment is going to cause me headaches for the next three years as I’m going to have to now defend it to every mainstream yahoo with a pencil, the ability to write linear algebra, and perform differential equations. lol
What can I say.. I got triggered! lol
Category Archives: Running blog
Intel moves towards production quantum computing with new 17-qubit chip
Devin Coldewey,
TechCrunch
Intel’s quantum computing efforts have yielded a new 17-qubit chip, which the company has just delivered to its partner in that field, QuTech in the Netherlands. It’s not a major advance in the actual computing power or applications — those are still in very early days — but it’s a step toward production systems that can be ordered and delivered to spec rather than experimental ones that live in a physics lab somewhere.
Intel’s celebration of this particular chip is a bit arbitrary; 17 isn’t some magic number in the quantum world, nor does this chip do any special tricks other quantum computer systems can’t. Intel is just happy that its history and undeniable expertise in designing and fabricating chips and architectures is paying off in a new phase of computing.
I chatted with Intel’s director of quantum hardware, Jim Clarke, about the new system.
It’s not quite like popping out a new Core processor every year, but there’s plenty of overlap.
“Our infrastructure allows us to adapt the materials and the package,” Clarke said. “If you think of a material that might be good for a qubit chip, Intel likely already has a mature process for that material or at least experience with it.”
That isn’t easy when the field of computing they’re attempting to enter is largely theoretical. That’s why partners like QuTech, a research institute under TU Delft, are essential. Intel isn’t short on big brains, but a dedicated facility under a major technical university is likely more fertile ground for this kind of bleeding-edge work.
The basic relationship is that Intel makes the chips, and QuTech tests them with the latest algorithms, models, and instruments. They turn around and say something like “that was great, but we’ll need at least 14 qubits to do this next thing, and we saw a lot of interference under such and such conditions.” Intel jots it down and a few months later (there’s no set timeline), out comes a new one, and the cycle repeats.
I’m simplifying, of course, because I don’t know the details of all this quantum tomfoolery (who can, really?), but that’s a powerful cycle to nurture.
The results so far let Intel boast of a chip that, thanks to the company’s manufacturing prowess and the work by QuTech, has considerably improved in reliability and performance over the last two years, while the architecture, system infrastructure (such as interconnects and testing methods) and so on have evolved alongside.
Of course, these amazing quantum computers still don’t really do anything yet — and they have to operate at around 20 thousandths of a degree above absolute zero. But the first problem is more exciting than limiting (the potential of these machines, theoretically, is enormous), and the second one, to my surprise, isn’t really a big deal any more.
Turns out (perhaps you knew, but I didn’t) that you can package a multi-qubit quantum computing system, cooled to the millikelvin level, in an enclosure the size of an oil drum.
There’s a long way to go in the quantum computing world, but it’s a no-brainer for companies like Intel to bet on the concept; its billions of dollars in infrastructure serve excellently for collateral.
There are new ideas of space, energy, and matter
Bose–Einstein condensate
Chill a gas to almost absolute zero and all particle movement ceases.
When this occurs, information is shown to behave according to the rules of Quantum Mechanics. But no one knows why.
Einstein predicted in 1925 that this phenomenon would occur, but actually reaching the conditions necessary to observe this in the lab has always been a challenge.
His understanding was that a Bose–Einstein condensate, which is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (that is, very near 0 K or -273.15 °C). Would create such conditions where a large fraction of the bosons would occupy their lowest quantum state. at which point quantum effects would become apparent on a macroscopic scale. These effects are called macroscopic quantum phenomena.
Mixing two Bose–Einstein condensates isn’t like blending ordinary gases — the condensates instead behave like waves, interfering with one another so that two atoms combined together can result in no atom at all.
When these gasses become Bose–Einstein condensate’s it’s because they’ve been “forced” to show this characteristic. This phenomenon shows in experiments that all particles hold this potential. Thereby proclaiming wave particle duality as fundamental
Satyendra Nath Bose first applied the quantum statistics of light quanta or photons, expanded later by Einstein to include general matter. Taken further by experiments in electromagnetism and metallurgy, we currently call this principle Superconductivity.
…”The International Space Station is a prime location to perform such experiments because of lack of interference from the pull of gravity.” Nola Taylor Redd stated in his article on the International Space Station and NASA’s Cold Atom Lab.
When we are able to see concepts and observations prove out from a few angles like this, it becomes clear that all matter, energy, and light are comprised the same way.
David LaPoint, the creator of the video series “The Primer Fields,” emphatically declares this to be true as well. Although his theory is in direct opposition to the Standard Model, I feel that it explains much more that it leaves to question and supposition.
Following his concepts of energy to matter conversion, I propose the following as a better understanding of particle physics as we currently understand them.
The reason this effect occurs is because at any other temperature other than absolute zero, the waveforms (particles) are able to move about their environment This movement acts as a natural insulator from this phenomenon for particles not normally forced into these parameters within our normal space.
Once they have been slowed to a point where there movements no longer cause interruptions, the magnetic fields of the waveforms are able to maintain cohesion.
In this state, current is allowed to travel throughout the entire piece of matter as if it were the energy of the matter itself. This effect is most observable in nature when conducting experiments in the electromagnetic spectrum.
The SM does not allow for these interactions without QM. I propose that all matter, energy, and light are created as concentrations of energy called Waveforms or particles.
That each particle is a stable, self sustaining structure of energy created by electromagnetic interactions in plasma in vacuum.
I could be wrong,
But what if I was right?
Bose–Einstein condensate – Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bose%E2%80%93Einstein_condensateedia
Scientists to Create Coldest Spot in Universe on Space Station
http://news.yahoo.com/scientists-create-coldest-spot-universe-space-station-video-170711710.html
The Primer Fields
The Eight Biggest Stories In Exponential Tech
Written By: Jason Dorrier
Posted: 12/30/13 10:30 AM
2013 in Review: The Eight Biggest Stories In Exponential Tech
It’s been a fast-moving year, so before diving headlong into 2014, we thought we’d tap the brakes and revisit some of the year’s most notable stories in exponential technology. Keep in mind, this ain’t science, and the list is by no means all-inclusive. If you have a favorite topic we missed, forgive but don’t forget—tell us in the comments!
Google Robotics
In December, Google announced they’d acquired seven robotics companies over six months. Then they announced an electrifying eighth purchase—Boston Dynamics and their menagerie of mind-blowing bots. Added to Google’s ongoing artificial intelligence research, the potential for smart, capable robots seems greater than ever.
Bitcoin Mania
The virtual currency, Bitcoin, had a hyperactive year. In short: bubbles, busts, hackers, heists, speculators, regulators, pirates, and IPOs. Bitcoin evangelists believe it’s the beginning of a momentous shift from traditional centralized currencies to decentralized digital currencies. Skeptics think it’s a fascinating experiment, but ultimately untenable.
A Computer for Your Face
For $1,500, tech geeks rocked Google’s touch- and voice-operated augmented reality Glass device—even as skeptics warned Glass would mark the end of privacy. Oculus took their Rift virtual reality headset from duct-taped ski goggles to $75 million venture darling. Gamers and developers say its the real deal. A consumer version is on the way.
Driverless Cars
Self-driving headlines were previously dominated by Google, but 2013 brought the idea mainstream as heavy hitters including BMW, Nissan, Toyota, and Ford promised the tech from 2020 to 2025. Tesla beat all, pledging 90% automation in 2016. CEO, Elon Musk, said the last 10% is a more difficult problem and further away.
Technological Unemployment
Some economists suggested stubbornly elevated unemployment isn’t cyclical, it’s structural. The culprit? Advanced robots and automation are taking jobs from humans, and it’s only going to get worse. History tells us such arguments fail to predict all the new things humans will do instead—but a few experts insist this time is different.
Uncle Sam Wants Your Data
According to secret documents leaked by Edward Snowden some of the biggest names in tech had enabled the NSA to snoop on, well, just about everyone. The Snowden affair has changed the cost-benefit calculation of information exchange, somewhat tarnished trust in big tech companies, and heightened interest in information security.
Drone Delivery
Drones for good? What a novel idea. Amazon grabbed headlines by promising door-to-door fulfillment of orders by drone. But the firm wasn’t the first to suggest drone delivery. Matternet proposed an automated, Internet-inspired drone network to deliver goods in cities or medicine to poor rural areas seasonally cut off by flooded road.
Buy Your Next 3D Printer…at Staples?
Staples announced it would offer the $1,300 3D Systems Cube desktop 3D printer, while other firms introduced cheap (or free) 3D scanners. Is 3D printing poised to go mainstream? Autodesk CEO Carl Bass cautioned against the hype but went on to say, “Just as rip-mix-burn became the anthem for digital music, we are starting to do the same thing for the physical world with capture-modify-print (or download-modify-print)…”
http://singularityhub.com/2013/12/30/2013-in-review-the-eight-biggest-stories-in-exponential-tech/
The Mission is Sedition
By: Richard L. Brown
October 2, 2013
Sedition is defined as an illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority with the intent of causing the disruption of government. Considered a subversive act, it often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. The intent to “overthrow the government” is not a required element of the charge.
In 1798 the United States stood on the brink of war with France. The Federalists believed that Democratic-Republican criticism of Federalist policies was disloyal and feared that aliens living in the United States would sympathize with the French during a war.
Directed against Democratic-Republicans, of the time, a series of bills were passed by the Federalist Congress in 1798 and signed into law by President Adams. The most controversial of the new laws was the Sedition Act. It permitted strong government control over individual actions, and was in essence, an act that prohibited public opposition to the government. Fines and imprisonment could be used against those who “write, print, utter, or publish . . . any false, scandalous and malicious writing” against the government.
When Democratic-Republicans in some states refused to enforce federal laws, such as the Whiskey tax, and threatened to rebel, Federalists threatened to send the army to force them to capitulate
SUBVERSIVE POLITICAL ACTION – “A planned series of activities designed to accomplish political objectives by influencing, dominating, or displacing individuals or groups who are so placed as to affect the decisions and actions of a government.” Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. US Department of Defense 2005.
Under the laws of the United States, to betray a sworn oath of office, may be considered “treason,” “sedition,” or a “high crime”
History also shows that these “suspensions” of civil liberty’s were soon afterward removed, as they were only required to be in place due to the distracting influence of the time. When we look at the wordings, what Speaker Boehner and his allies are doing, seems to fit into the definition of perfectly. If this is in fact true. Then the definitions should, and I believe will, mirror the actions and accusations being compared to, and against them.
That said…, if we now agree that their intent, and actions meet the definition proposed; “Sedition,”
-
Then, we as citizens would be honor bound to discuss this amongst each other in an attempt to verify it’s validity.
-
Argue it’s merits amongst each other in an attempt to reach a quorum,
-
If the quorum is in agreement, present an accusation and demand that charges be proffered.
What about a Human Singularity?
I was just thinking about how the Human race could itself be on a course towards a “Singularity.”
I’ve made the comment many times before, that “we are at a time when changes in morals, values, and ethics are at an all time high for our species.”
At no other time in history, have we gone through so many different changes in sociological and psychological belief systems at one time.
Evolutionary change is apparent in our species as we attempt to adapt o the environment that is being created around us.
If we now look at things this way, isn’t it a bit more apparent how some of these might be related?
The world communicated for history very slowly. As such, neither did MVE’s. (When everyone lives in the same communities, raising the same kids, etc, values and traditions are handed down. These traditions and values will typically be reflected in the behaviors of the larger group. (or the species in Darwinian evolution)
Only when the larger group “needs” the change, (unless isolated) the individual desires will be suppressed and therefore largely unchanged. ( Edit/cont. – What is done in privacy against these …. )
If however, the group DOES need for the MVE systems to change, they will.Let’s look at an example. When “population needs raise, so drops the age of marriage.
But I want to mention the Singularity connection.
In this, one might look at the numbers of changes within numbers of generations.
Ie: How many (and on what level) MVE changes have gone on within a society as a whole, and how many generations did it take for the change to occur. (Ie: The acceptance of homosexual behavior.)
If we take today
Baffling pulsar leaves astronomers in the dark
http://sci.esa.int/xmm-newton/51314-baffling-pulsar-leaves-astronomers-in-the-dark/
Baffling pulsar leaves astronomers in the dark
24 January 2013
New observations of a highly variable pulsar using ESA’s XMM-Newton are perplexing astronomers. Monitoring this pulsar simultaneously in X-rays and radio waves, astronomers have revealed that this source, whose radio emission is known to ‘switch on and off’ periodically, exhibits the same behaviour, but in reverse, when observed at X-ray wavelengths. It is the first time that a switching X-ray emission has been detected from a pulsar, and the properties of this emission are unexpectedly puzzling. As no current model is able to explain this switching behaviour, which occurs within only a few seconds, these observations have reopened the debate about the physical mechanisms powering the emission from pulsars.
 |
|
Artist’s impression of a pulsar in radio-bright mode. |
Few classes of astronomical objects are as baffling as pulsars – which were discovered as flickering sources of radio waves and soon after interpreted as rapidly rotating and strongly magnetised neutron stars. Even though about 2000 pulsars have been found since the first was discovered in 1967, a detailed understanding of the mechanisms that power them still eludes astronomers.
“There is a general agreement about the origin of the radio emission from pulsars: it is caused by highly energetic electrons, positrons and ions moving along the field lines of the pulsar’s magnetic field, and we see it pulsate because the rotation and magnetic axes are misaligned,” explains Wim Hermsen from SRON, the Netherlands Institute for Space Research in Utrecht, The Netherlands. “How exactly the particles are stripped off the neutron star’s surface and accelerated to such high energy, however, is still largely unclear,” he adds.
Hermsen led a new study based on observations of the pulsar known as PSR B0943+10, which were performed simultaneously in X-rays, with ESA’s XMM-Newton, and in radio waves. By probing the emission from the pulsar at different wavelengths, the study had been designed to discern which of various possible physical processes take place in the vicinity of the magnetic poles of pulsars. Instead of narrowing down the possible mechanisms suggested by theory, however, the results of Hermsen’s observing campaign challenge all existing models for pulsar emission, reopening the question of how these intriguing sources are powered.
“Many pulsars have a rather erratic behaviour: in the space of a few seconds, their emission becomes weaker or even disappears for a while, just to go back to the previous level after some hours,” says Hermsen. “We do not know what causes such a switch, but the fact that the pulsar keeps memory of its previous state and goes back to it suggests that it must be something fundamental.”
Recent studies indicate that the switch between what are usually referred to as ‘radio-bright’ and ‘radio-quiet’ states is correlated to the pulsar’s dynamics. As pulsars rotate, their spinning period slows down gradually, and in some cases the slow-down process has been observed to accelerate and slow down again, in conjunction with the pulsar switching between radio-bright and quiet states. The existence of correlated variations in both the rotation and emission suggest a connection between a pulsar’s immediate vicinity and, on a grander scale, its co-rotating magnetosphere, which may extend up to about 50 000 km for objects like PSR B0943+10. In order for the radio emission to vary so radically on the short timescales observed, the pulsar’s global environment must undergo a very rapid – and reversible – transformation.
“Since the switch between a pulsar’s bright and quiet states links phenomena that occur on local and global scales, a thorough understanding of this process could clarify several aspects of pulsar physics. Unfortunately, we have not yet been able to explain it,” says Hermsen.
 |
|
Artist’s impression of a pulsar in X-ray-bright/radio-quiet mode. Credit: ESA/ATG medialab |
Hermsen and his colleagues planned to search for an analogous pattern at a different wavelength – in X-rays – to investigate what causes this switching behaviour. They chose as their subject PSR B0943+10, a pulsar that is well known for its switching behaviour at radio wavelengths and for its X-ray emission, which is brighter than might be expected for its age.
“Young pulsars shine brightly in X-rays because the surface of the neutron star is still very hot. But PSR B0943+10 is five million years old, which is relatively old for a pulsar: the neutron star’s surface has cooled down by then,” explains Hermsen.
Astronomers know of only a handful of old pulsars that shine in X-rays and believe that this emission comes from the magnetic poles – the sites on the neutron star’s surface where the acceleration of charged particles is triggered. “We think that, from the polar caps, accelerated particles either move outwards to the magnetosphere, where they produce radio emission, or inwards, bombarding the polar caps and creating X-ray emitting hot-spots,” Hermsen adds.
There are two main models that describe these processes, depending on whether the electric and magnetic fields at play allow charged particles to escape freely from the neutron star’s surface. In both cases, it is believed that the emission of X-rays follows that of radio waves, but the emission that is observed in each scenario is characterised by different temporal and spectral characteristics. Monitoring the pulsar in X-rays and radio waves at the same time, the astronomers hoped to be able to discern between the two models.
Obtaining observing time on the requested telescopes turned out to be a rather lengthy procedure. “We needed very long observations, to be sure that we would record the pulsar switching back and forth between bright and quiet states several times,” says Hermsen, “So we asked for a total of 36 hours of observation with XMM-Newton. This is quite a lot of time, and it took us five years before our proposal was accepted.”
 |
|
The two states of pulsar PSR B0943+10 as observed with XMM-Newton and LOFAR. Credit: ESA/ATG medialab; ESA/XMM-Newton; ASTRON/LOFAR |
The observations were performed in late 2011. The X-ray monitoring performed with XMM-Newton was accompanied by simultaneous observations at radio waves from the Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) in India and the recently inaugurated Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) in the Netherlands, which was used during its commissioning phase, while testing its science operations.
“The X-ray emission of pulsar PSR B0943+10 beautifully mirrors the switches that are seen at radio wavelengths but, to our surprise, the correlation between these two emissions appears to be inverse: when the source is at its brightest in radio waves, it reaches its faintest in X-rays, and vice versa,” says Hermsen.
The XMM-Newton data also show that the source pulsates in X-rays only during the X-ray-bright phase – which corresponds to the quiet state at radio wavelengths. During this phase, the X-ray emission appears to be the sum of two components: a pulsating component consisting of thermal X-rays, which is seen to switch off during the X-ray-quiet phase, and a persistent one consisting of non-thermal X-rays. Neither of the leading models for pulsar emission predicts such behaviour.
“The data collected during our monitoring campaign are truly challenging our understanding of pulsars, since no current model is able to explain them,” comments Hermsen. “In the second half of 2013, we plan to repeat the same study for another pulsar, PSR B1822-09, which exhibits similar radio emission properties, but is characterised by a different geometrical configuration. This will allow us to study these extreme objects under different viewing angles,” he adds.
In the meantime, these observations will keep theoretical astrophysicists busy investigating possible physical mechanisms that could cause the sudden and drastic changes to the pulsar’s entire magnetosphere and result in such a curious emission.
“The unpredictable behaviour of this pulsar, revealed using the great sensitivity of the telescopes on board XMM-Newton, may require a radically new approach to study the fundamental processes that power these fascinating objects,” comments Norbert Schartel, XMM-Newton Project Scientist at ESA.
Notes for editors
The study presented here is based on X-ray observations of pulsar PSR B0943+10 performed with ESA’s XMM-Newton between 4 November and 4 December 2011. These observations consisted of six observations in the energy range between 0.2 and 10 keV, each lasting six hours. The X-ray data were gathered at the same time as observations at radio wavelengths performed with the Indian Giant Metrewave Radio Telescope (GMRT) at 320 MHz and the international Low Frequency Array (LOFAR) at 140 MHz.
The research was led by Wim Hermsen (SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research and Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam), Lucien Kuiper and Jelle de Plaa (SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research), Jason Hessels and Joeri van Leeuwen (ASTRON and Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’, University of Amsterdam), Dipanjan Mitra and Rahul Basu (NCFRA-TIFR, Pune, India), Joanna Rankin (University of Vermont, Burlington, USA), Ben Stappers (University of Manchester, UK), and Geoffrey Wright (University of Sussex, UK). The Pulsar Working Group and the Builders Group from the LOFAR-telescope, which was at the time in the commissioning phase, supported the observations.
The European Space Agency’s X-ray Multi-Mirror Mission, XMM-Newton, was launched in December 1999. It is the biggest scientific satellite to have been built in Europe and uses over 170 wafer-thin cylindrical mirrors spread over three high throughput X-ray telescopes. Its mirrors are among the most powerful ever developed. XMM-Newton’s orbit takes it almost a third of the way to the Moon, allowing for long, uninterrupted views of celestial objects. The scientific community can apply for observing time on XMM-Newton on a competitive basis.
Related publications
W. Hermsen, et al., “Synchronous X-ray and Radio Mode Switches: a Rapid Global Transformation of the Pulsar Magnetosphere“, 2013, Science, 339, 6118, 436-439, DOI:10.1126/science.1230960
Contacts
Wim Hermsen
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research
Utrecht, The Netherlands
and Astronomical Institute ‘Anton Pannekoek’
University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Email: w.hermsen
sron.nl
Phone: +31-88-7775871; +31-614547929
Norbert Schartel
ESA XMM-Newton Project Scientist
Directorate of Science and Robotic Exploration
European Space Agency
Email: Norbert.Schartelesa.int
Phone: +34-91-8131-184
Einstein On The Porch:
It’s Sunday or so says the calendar and the habit of knowing what day it is because it tells me what my responsibilities are, or should be, is waning as a natural consequence of fully immersing myself in the Florida environment I have contemplated for 20 years or so.
The calendar may be the first to go into obsolescence followed shortly afterward by my watch thus allowing my full perception of the time-space continuum in new contexts and my place in it.
The cranes now stroll to within 30-feet of my back porch and I don’t obstruct their movement with my movement for a camera or even a sip from my coffee cup because for a few minutes I am not a steward of nature but part of it.
The first day of my calculus class years ago the teaching assistant announced, Anything known to man can be expressed through math,” and as she walked through the aisles of desks gifting us with the course syllabus I waited for her arrival.
When she handed me the paper I asked her, “How does math express beauty?”
She smiled and surely made a mental note she had a trouble maker in her class.
But how do we know if it’s bigger?
Let’s say we take a piece of Helium.
We’ll weigh it, and call it 2.
Let’s take another of these and slam it into the first one really fast.
What comes out must surely be less than what went in right?
What if it comes out 3 plus 1?
Can there be one that’s bigger?
Or would that be fusion?
How do we know it can’t be 3?
Do we really know our He weighs 2?
If the piece is opened isn’t there a lot of energy there?
How much do you think “it” weighs?
What if I told you that the numbers that fly off are not just a weight per say, but more along the lines of a ratio of the whole piece flying?
That only temperature of the fusion is required to go up or down the scale? (The assumption being that Iron is at the bottom of this scale)
Try this.
Let’s convert Hydrogen Plasma into a number we can deal with.
157,500 deg K (http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=+13.6eV+%2F+boltzmann+constant++in+fahrenheit)
Want to know something interesting?
Our Suns core temperature, (a Hydrogen burning sun) is almost exactly ten times that.
15.7 Million
CERN: Universe of Particles
A speaker magnet with poles like ???
I just decided it was time to pull out the old experiment from school.
So, I took one of my many precious pictures of my daughter, and removed it from it’s glass, and frame enclosure. (It’s for science, she’ll understand!)
WI just realized I should probably do it with prep props! 
WHAT: Experimental Platform for working with Magnetism.
NEEDED:
1 inexpensive glass photograph frame (thinner glass)
1 scrap mid range speaker (magnet still intact)
1 piece of “Steel wool.”
A file
1 sheet white paper
1 pair vice grips (larger than the circumference of the speaker)
1 pair channel loc’s
Here’s how I got the magnet. (Sorry, I forgot to film this part)
I took the vice grips and applied pressure around the outside of the magnet until I was able to remove it from the speaker while still in it’s circular shape. (I got lucky I think. This may take you a few times)
Anyway, once removed, there was also a “plate” I had to separate. (That’s what the channel loc’s were for.
Once removed, I ended up with a magnet like this.
(Note the white sheet of paper?)
The picture frame is just that. Clean the glass well, (BE CAREFUL!) Make sure it’s dry, then shave the “Steel wool” over the glass with the file. Let as many shavings hit the glass as possible.
Now, by using the magnet underneath the glass, you can see how the magnetic fields work.
My first observations?
There is a field zero halfway into the side of the magnet.
That the shavings will be able to diagram the entire magnet for me.
That it (so far) looks amazingly like the way the poles work on a planetary body.
Some might ask, “How are pics of space Singularity?”
Easy.
It’s all iow we define Singularity.
If we say that it’s a time when changes will occur around us to such a degree that Humanity itself will change, and that these changes will be dramatic in their scope, yet seen as if they were everyday common events, then pictures like this would surely qualify.
We are at a time in history where we are able to see the Universe with such clarity that our entire understanding of it is being challenged and re-written.
Aluminum-air battery (Primer Fields Technology?)
Typically, ramblings like that below are some of my most brilliant of ideas. What they usually are is my attempt to simply get them down in whatever medium I have available. That said, I don’t like to remove them either.
below was an attempt to state something a little closer to this. (I hope)
When I think of batteries. I think of 1.5 v of various sizes that Duracell made for all of my toys, hobbies, devices. Because of the same voltage, I learned of current with these dry medium, electricity storing devices.
I also knew of the one in our car. This one, and the one in the motorcycles had lead plates, and battery acid, (but people always added water???) Anyway. We also called it Electrolyte which kind of spelled it out. Had to learn current again. 🙂
When I think of cars, I think of helicopters.
??????
R/C Helicopters! lol
I play with UAV’s. And unfortunately, one of the only reasons we don’t all have a very safe helicopter in our driveways, is because of the fact that battery technology does not scale upwards. Why not?
There has never been a combination of metals, or hydried’s or whatever, that works quite right.
My thinking was this. Picture better “waveforms” that store in better substances.
I’m thinking that the energy conversion part would be better off done using electrical engineering rather than brute force chemistry however I also believe this problem may also only be industry or application related.
What I’m saying is this. There are going to be various possible ways that manipulation of these fields are done. As we are currently left to theorize on some of these at this time, we can only do just that. Since we know that some of our science was good, 🙂 we also know that some of it still is.
If energy is separated in as many different ways as it is. And each of these have certain specific useable properties, it makes sence that there are commonalities with some more combinations that we already imagine. Stability or manipulation of current frequencies might be one such a way. If a waveforms equal to it’s field size, and matter etc. Then that would indicate that in some cases these might be separated, isolated, manipulated, etc thus allowing for very specific uses of energy and matter.
If one type stores and releases better when in this range of wave frequency’s then that could mean use Iron in Oxygen with a touch of Sulfuric acid and dry till crispy or something! lol
Either way, the switch would be using the chemistry to force the change this way, this might be a wholly wrong approach though. It shouldn’t take long to knock out most of the thinking that aren’t going to work. Whatever the course, I can definitely see storage of energy working way better if electrically “loaded” so to speak. I’m sure that there is some Waveform (particle) that is going to be very good at loading and holding and releasing large sums of energy, It’s going to probably be of some conductive material, that will say “fill up” those little fields. IDK
Could something like this be the switch?
Think about it.
If we are using fields, then we think copper.
f we are thinking Copper, we are thinking Lead, and Acids.
Lead, Acids, Copper, and Electromagnetism equals the ability to very simply change field conditions and environments.
Storage and therefore use, currents etc stability, would come from using common storage mediums, to whatever “field” or Energy structure, Stable waveform at a specific frequency to mass, that is stored in say, a medium of another where it’s conductivity, to , etc … get it? To convert these, I could easily see how an acid, and or oxidation type reaction could serve as the mechanism for a common electrical current need.
Metal-air batteries get their energy via interaction between oxygen and metals. In this new battery system, the aluminum serves as the anode and the oxygen in the air as a cathode. The system is made up of aluminum plates that give up their energy and must eventually be replaced (via recycling, the company says). Water is used as an electrolyte, and thus it too must be replenished on a regular basis. The company claims that each plate holds enough energy to carry an EV for approximately 20 miles and that their system currently holds 50 of the plates at one time, which together add up to a charge capacity of 1000 miles (the system needs a water fill-up every 200 miles). Once the plates are depleted they must be replaced.
The idea of using metal-air batteries isn’t new, researchers have been studying the possibilities for several years and some have even suggested aluminum-air batteries are the wave of the future. What’s been holding them up is the problem of carbon dioxide in the air causing corrosion damage—that’s what’s new with this system. Phinergy claims they have found a way to prevent the gas from entering the system and in so doing have created a battery that can last as long as the car it powers. The entire approach is novel in the respect that a metal is used almost as a fuel source, rather than as a battery component. When it runs out, more fresh metal is needed, and it being metal, it’s rather heavy—one pack of 50 plates weighs roughly 55 pounds. For that reason, Phinergy is promoting the aluminum-air battery as a trip extender, rather than as a means of powering commuter trips. It could be used either in vehicles that typically make long journeys, or as an added feature for traditional EVs (which typically have a 100 mile range at best). They add that they believe cars using their aluminum-air batteries will be sold commercially as early as 2017.Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-03-phinergy-aluminum-air-battery-capable-fueling.html#jCp
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2013-03-phinergy-aluminum-air-battery-capable-fueling.html#jCp
http://phys.org/news/2013-03-phinergy-aluminum-air-battery-capable-fueling.html
Amazon CEO Recovers NASA’s Apollo Engines from Ocean Deep
Mar 20, 2013 7:58pm
Amazon.com founder and CEO Jeff Bezos today announced that his underwater expedition had successfully recovered the mangled wreckage of two rocket engines from NASA’s Apollo program from the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean.
After spending three weeks at sea, Bezos wrote on his personal blog that he and his team were heading back to Cape Canaveral, in Florida, with a treasure trove of NASA artifacts from the space era.
“We’ve seen an underwater wonderland — an incredible sculpture garden of twisted F-1 engines that tells the story of a fiery and violent end, one that serves testament to the Apollo program,” Bezos wrote.
Thrust Chamber from one of the F-1 engines sitting on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. Credit: Bezos Expeditions
Nossle from one of the F-1 engines sitting on the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean. Credit: Bezos Expeditions
Bezos’ team used remotely operated vehicles to dive down 14,000 feet (almost three miles) to the dark depths of the ocean floor, where they recovered “major components” of two Saturn V F-1 rocket engines flown during the Apollo program (1963-’72). The program included lunar missions and earth orbiting missions, most famously Apollo 11, which sent Neil Armstrong to the moon in 1969.
NASA Administrator Charles Bolden said in a statement to ABC News that Bezos approached the space agency nearly a year ago with his plan to recover the engines and praised the team’s efforts.
“We share the excitement expressed by Jeff and his team in announcing the recovery of two of the powerful Saturn V first-stage engines from the bottom of the Atlantic Ocean,” Bolden said. ”This is a historic find and I congratulate the team for its determination and perseverance in the recovery of these important artifacts of our first efforts to send humans beyond Earth orbit.”
After decades of being exposed to water, many of the engine components are missing serial numbers or pieces, “which is going to make mission identification difficult,” Bezos wrote.
NASA will work with the expedition team to restore the engine hardware and prevent further corrosion. Bezos hopes to then put the engines on display.
F-1 engine part on the deck of Bezos Expedition’s Seabed Worker. Credit: Bezos Expedition
Think Magnetism 3 DRAFT
If the Aurora is a Magnetic field, then, we should think of them as being made up of little balls of energy. Or, “Particles.” connected together.
That should be easy enough since that’s what we’re taught. Right?
(Well it should be .)
Anyway…, they’ve got to be really small, and they’ve got to be connected. So lets make them a shape that can touch, (We already know that conduction allows for information (Ie. Energy) to be transmitted this way.) So something round.
Since they are (or will be) comprised of something, (particles) they therefore have mass.
So, we’ll give them each a field. Call them Magnetic North and Magnetic South.
Kind of like the Earth.
And then apply this thinking now to “ALL”particles of Matter.
Even light.
Now, at this point, I have to remind you of something that theoretical physicist Mr. Richard Feynman once said.
Although he was literally correct in his assumption, it only served to hinder us in our understandings of what matter and energy are. His assertion at the time, was based on the incorrect or unfinished definition of matter.
MATTER: …”material substance that occupies space, has mass, and is composed predominantly of atoms consisting of protons, neutrons, and electrons, that constitutes the observable universe, and that is nonconvertible with energy.”
So let’s start here.
Ooops! I see one thing wrong already. There’s something missing from our definition.
It’s missing two key words that have helped create common misunderstandings in today’s understanding of matter. These words are “volume” and “Mass.”
When Mr. Feynman was speaking, he was referring to the fact that certain forms of energy did not posses these attributes at “rest,” and therefore were not considered “Matter.”
…”material substance that occupies space.” Well, We know it meets this requirement, because we can observe it. If it wasn’t “made of something, we couldn’t interact with it. Focus it, reflect it, store it, or generate it.
…”has mass,” The thinking that caused Mr. Feynman to make his assertion, was that since they could not “ever” slow energy down to a “fixed” position like other pieces of matter, and that”solid matter” did not move on its own volition, or “emit” other forms of energy, that it must not fit into the same class.
…”is composed predominantly of atoms consisting of protons, neutrons, and electrons,“ This statement violates both previous assertions. But, we’ll give it credit anyway. …”
Now it is going to get a little complicated as we start discussing how these magnetic fields overlap each other and interact with each other.
Here we have the photon and its fields again.
We need to realize though that in reality the electromagnetic fields do not just stop at the limits of the fields show here. They continue out much further, but they also get much weaker as they go further away from the photon. But for now, let’s look at how the field develops.
The fields are attracted to this point where it passes between fields polarity barrier (See interference), one at a time, simultaneously “reversing.” the particles polarity.
The flip point.
Showing the structure formation
Each one has an unlimited source (until all matter is absorbed) coming in, and “jets” where excess energy is released.
Note the Horizontal “spin?”
Note how the field is created in vacuum with plasma?
See how energy forms?
Now, using this
Related articles
- Magnetism – Molder of the Universe (thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com)
- More Vindication (thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com)
- The Primer Fields #1 (Transcript) (thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com)
Think Magnetism
But I don’t get it!
Oh but THANK GOD at least you are trying!!!!!!
Ok. It’s really simple.
(What follows is actually a bit of an excerpt that loses some context unless explained) this comes from a comment section on new discovery on light polarization. Through comments of the article I wrote the following.
Mar 9,2013 The problem everyone is having is the understanding of the principle concept to begin with. It’s really simple. Imagine a steel ball on a magnet. It rolls to the attracted side. Drill a dip into the magnet.
The ball holds even if turned upside down. Make it all bigger in your mind and keep drilling until you break through. Put the ball back. In your minds microscope you should see the ball hanging in mid space.That is a representation of the forces being used. Imagine how these can be used to “Stream” magnets pull to each other, then repel. imagine if you had two and had one pull to the other. Then quickly switch your magnet around so it now repels. If one place is held by triangular point compression, it becomes fixed. This can then create a “Flip point” that can/will pull to itself, then with (possibly a true,) “zero point” or place where the “flip of polarity occurs. The fields are created by the structure of the fields themselves, and the particle comes into existence through understanding of the principle concept to begin with. Imagine a steel ball on a magnet. It rolls to the attracted side. Drill a dip into the magnet. The ball holds even if turned upside down. Make it all bigger in your mind and keep drilling until you breakthrough. Put the ball back. In your minds microscope you should see the ball hanging in mid space. That is a representation of the forces being
used. Imagine how these can be used to “Stream” the flow of electrons. By using the magnets to pull to each other, then reverse and repel. Imagine if you had two and had one pull to the
other. Then quickly switch your magnet around so it now repels. If one
position is held by triangular point compression, it becomes fixed. Another one in the environment would be either created or not dependent on matter stream) but
in this case, you would have made a “field barrier of one polarity, whose existence literally came into being when the released energy made contact with the first particle it met on the other side. This created a “fixed point to fixed point” condition thus setting up the other side of the bowl as soon as the other polarity makes contact. Then apply this to all matter, then apply field strength to (size) to density and properties of matter.
This can then create a “Flip point” that can/will pull to itself, then
with (possibly a true,) “zero point” position where the “flip of
polarity occurs. The fields are created by the structure of the fields
themselves, and the particle comes into existence through natural,
mutual, attraction.
Let’s see if I’ve got this right
…”The size of the waveform is equal to the mass and the energy of the particle.”
I wonder if I just wrote my first law?
That would be so cool!
thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com
More vindication
NASA Discovers Hidden Portals In Earth’s Magnetic Field
Arjun March 8, 2013
Our planet has come a long way in scientific breakthroughs and discoveries. Mainstream science is beginning to discover new concepts of reality that have the potential to change our perception about our planet and the extraterrestrial environment that surrounds it forever. Star gates, wormholes, and portals have been the subject of conspiracy theories and theoretical physics for decades, but that is all coming to an end as we continue to grow in our understanding about the true nature of our reality.
In physics, a wormhole was a hypothetical feature of space time that would be a shortcut through space-time. We often wonder how extraterrestrials could travel so far and this could be one of many explanations. Although scientists still don’t really understand what they have found, it does open the mind to many possibilities.
Turning science fiction into science fact seems to happen quite often these days and NASA did it by announcing the discovery of hidden portals in Earth’s magnetic field. NASA calls them X-points or electron diffusion regions. They are places where the magnetic field of Earth connects to the magnetic field of the Sun, which in turn creates an uninterrupted path leading from our own planet to the sun’s atmosphere which is 93 million miles away.
NASA used its THEMIS spacecraft, as well as a European Cluster probe, to examine this phenomenon. They found that these portals open and close dozens of times each day. It’s funny, because there is a lot of evidence that points toward the sun being a giant star gate for the ‘gods’ to pass back and forth from other dimensions and universes. The portals that NASA has discovered are usually located tens of thousands of kilometres from Earth and most of them are short-lived; others are giant, vast and sustained.
As far as scientists can determine, these portals aid in the transfer of tons of magnetically charged particles that flow from the Sun causing the northern and southerns lights and geomagnetic storms. They aid in the transfer of the magnetic field from the Sun to the Earth. In 2014, the U.S. space agency will launch a new mission called Magnetospheric Multi scale Mission (MMS) which will include four spacecraft that will circle the Earth to locate and then study these portals. They are located where the Earth and the Sun’s magnetic fields connect and where the unexplained portals are formed.
NASA funded the University of Iowa for this study, and they are still unclear as to what these portals are. All they have done is observed charged particles flowing through them that cause electro-magnetic phenomenon in Earth’s atmosphere.
Magnetic portals are invisible, unstable and elusive. they open and close without warming and there are no signposts to guide is in – Dr Scudder, University of Iowa
Mainstream science continues to grow further, but I often get confused between mainstream science, and science that is formed in the black budget world. It seems that information and discovery isn’t information and discovery without the type of ‘proof’ that the human race requires. Given that the human race requires, and has a certain criteria for ‘proof’, which has been taught to us by the academic world, information can easily be suppressed by concealing that ‘proof’. It’s no secret that the department of defence receives trillions of dollars that go unaccounted for and everything developed within the United States Air Force Space Agency remains classified. They are able to classify information for the sake of ‘national security’. Within the past few years, proof has been emerging for a number of phenomenon that would suggest a whole other scientific world that operates separately from mainstream science.
We have the technology to take ET home, anything you can imagine we already have the technology to do, but these technologies are locked up in black budget projects. It would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity – Ben Rich, Fmr CEO of LockHeed Skunk Works
I use this video a lot in many of my posts, but it is just a profound statement, I love to use it over and over. He is x NASA personnel so it kind of fits in with the article.
Sources:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2012/29jun_hiddenportals/
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sunearth/news/mag-portals.html
As stuff breaks
Never ending liht bulbs?
Dynamical Casimir effect in meta material converts vacuum fluctuations into real photons
phys.org
(Phys.org) —In the strange world of quantum mechanics, the vacuum state (sometimes referred to as the quantum vacuum, simply as the vacuum) is a quantum system’s lowest possible energy state. While not containing physical particles, neither is it an empty void: Rather, the quantum vacuum contains …..
-
St**** So**rF**:I can show you a video of it.It’s another (3 now I think) covered within the Primer Fields that Azure brought to my attention in Ray‘s group.Oh, and I meant the technical papers released “SINCE” the video…:)
-
M*** M**the:wow!.. where is the Video? thanks -
St**** So**rF**:Start here,In this video series the currently accepted theories of physics and astrophysics…See More
-
D** R2D2:In the first several minutes of that video I’m already highly skeptical of the scientific merit. He doesn’t speak like a scientist at all. Scientists have hypothesis, this guy says unequivocally that he has the answer.
I don’t have the domain expertise to claim he’s wrong on a factual basis but judging by the way he speaks I doubt there’s much to his claims. -
St**** So**rF**:I would say keep watching. As to the voice, I assume it’s an actor. As to the assertion? How else do you attack an accepted theory. I have been informed that the thesis has been submitted to a number of journals, but no specifics. I have checked the re…See More
-
St**** So**rF**:I know that all sounds truncated, I’ll try to clarify….”I could fin…” In this statement, I mean, I couldn’t find anyone conducting and publishing results in the field, nor has anyone even suggested it. BUT..If you look at the work that HAS been pub…See More
-
St**** So**rF**:Sorry again. Third journal publication: http://phys.org/news/2013-03-nihilo-dynamical-casimir-effect-metamaterial.html – https://thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com/2013/03/03/some-vindication/ – Still looking for the other one
Related articles
- What I Think – The Primer Fields (thesingularityeffect.wordpress.com)
- Ex nihilo: Dynamical Casimir effect in metamaterial converts vacuum fluctuations into real photons (phys.org)
The Singularity Effect 
I can’t believe this part still escapes them though. Ready? They mention the He, but then forget it as an individual.
When one thing has mass, and it moves, it creates energy. Gravity is an example of this. As observed, gravitational forces will seek “like” matter thus one becomes two, then three, etc. (Make it easy, a cloud) So one to the other, to the other…wait. They always forget that the gravitational pull is now greater too because of the increase in mass and matter. So it gets stronger.
As one is attracted to another and they meet, the mass of the whole increases as does their gravitational effects.
Give it enough of that cloud of “individual atoms of Helium,” (Oh yea, make it plasma though) and 1 becomes 2, becomes 3, 5 Hundred, 20 Quadrillion, more and more dense,which increases gravity even more, pulling in more matter, etc. See how it can now compound on itself and create an environment for fusion? Remember magnetic fields go hand in hand with this. They work as containment.
And the gravitational attractant!!! 🙂
The “stars” then convert that He, through efficient fusion, into every single element down to Iron. (Ie: Converts He energy, into physical matter) simply by a mechanism of convection.
Believe it or not, you now hold the very simple secret to the Universe.