Chill a gas to almost absolute zero and all particle movement ceases.
When this occurs, information is shown to behave according to the rules of Quantum Mechanics. But no one knows why.
Einstein predicted in 1925 that this phenomenon would occur, but actually reaching the conditions necessary to observe this in the lab has always been a challenge.
His understanding was that a Bose–Einstein condensate, which is a state of matter of a dilute gas of bosons cooled to temperatures very close to absolute zero (that is, very near 0 K or -273.15 °C). Would create such conditions where a large fraction of the bosons would occupy their lowest quantum state. at which point quantum effects would become apparent on a macroscopic scale. These effects are called macroscopic quantum phenomena.
Mixing two Bose–Einstein condensates isn’t like blending ordinary gases — the condensates instead behave like waves, interfering with one another so that two atoms combined together can result in no atom at all.
When these gasses become Bose–Einstein condensate’s it’s because they’ve been “forced” to show this characteristic. This phenomenon shows in experiments that all particles hold this potential. Thereby proclaiming wave particle duality as fundamental
Satyendra Nath Bose first applied the quantum statistics of light quanta or photons, expanded later by Einstein to include general matter. Taken further by experiments in electromagnetism and metallurgy, we currently call this principle Superconductivity.
…”The International Space Station is a prime location to perform such experiments because of lack of interference from the pull of gravity.” Nola Taylor Redd stated in his article on the International Space Station and NASA’s Cold Atom Lab.
When we are able to see concepts and observations prove out from a few angles like this, it becomes clear that all matter, energy, and light are comprised the same way.
David LaPoint, the creator of the video series “The Primer Fields,” emphatically declares this to be true as well. Although his theory is in direct opposition to the Standard Model, I feel that it explains much more that it leaves to question and supposition.
Following his concepts of energy to matter conversion, I propose the following as a better understanding of particle physics as we currently understand them.
The reason this effect occurs is because at any other temperature other than absolute zero, the waveforms (particles) are able to move about their environment This movement acts as a natural insulator from this phenomenon for particles not normally forced into these parameters within our normal space.
Once they have been slowed to a point where there movements no longer cause interruptions, the magnetic fields of the waveforms are able to maintain cohesion.
In this state, current is allowed to travel throughout the entire piece of matter as if it were the energy of the matter itself. This effect is most observable in nature when conducting experiments in the electromagnetic spectrum.
The SM does not allow for these interactions without QM. I propose that all matter, energy, and light are created as concentrations of energy called Waveforms or particles.
That each particle is a stable, self sustaining structure of energy created by electromagnetic interactions in plasma in vacuum.
I could be wrong,
But what if I was right?
Bose–Einstein condensate – Wikipedia
Scientists to Create Coldest Spot in Universe on Space Station
The Primer Fields
Written By: Jason Dorrier
Posted: 12/30/13 10:30 AM
2013 in Review: The Eight Biggest Stories In Exponential Tech
It’s been a fast-moving year, so before diving headlong into 2014, we thought we’d tap the brakes and revisit some of the year’s most notable stories in exponential technology. Keep in mind, this ain’t science, and the list is by no means all-inclusive. If you have a favorite topic we missed, forgive but don’t forget—tell us in the comments!
In December, Google announced they’d acquired seven robotics companies over six months. Then they announced an electrifying eighth purchase—Boston Dynamics and their menagerie of mind-blowing bots. Added to Google’s ongoing artificial intelligence research, the potential for smart, capable robots seems greater than ever.
The virtual currency, Bitcoin, had a hyperactive year. In short: bubbles, busts, hackers, heists, speculators, regulators, pirates, and IPOs. Bitcoin evangelists believe it’s the beginning of a momentous shift from traditional centralized currencies to decentralized digital currencies. Skeptics think it’s a fascinating experiment, but ultimately untenable.
A Computer for Your Face
For $1,500, tech geeks rocked Google’s touch- and voice-operated augmented reality Glass device—even as skeptics warned Glass would mark the end of privacy. Oculus took their Rift virtual reality headset from duct-taped ski goggles to $75 million venture darling. Gamers and developers say its the real deal. A consumer version is on the way.
Self-driving headlines were previously dominated by Google, but 2013 brought the idea mainstream as heavy hitters including BMW, Nissan, Toyota, and Ford promised the tech from 2020 to 2025. Tesla beat all, pledging 90% automation in 2016. CEO, Elon Musk, said the last 10% is a more difficult problem and further away.
Some economists suggested stubbornly elevated unemployment isn’t cyclical, it’s structural. The culprit? Advanced robots and automation are taking jobs from humans, and it’s only going to get worse. History tells us such arguments fail to predict all the new things humans will do instead—but a few experts insist this time is different.
Uncle Sam Wants Your Data
According to secret documents leaked by Edward Snowden some of the biggest names in tech had enabled the NSA to snoop on, well, just about everyone. The Snowden affair has changed the cost-benefit calculation of information exchange, somewhat tarnished trust in big tech companies, and heightened interest in information security.
Drones for good? What a novel idea. Amazon grabbed headlines by promising door-to-door fulfillment of orders by drone. But the firm wasn’t the first to suggest drone delivery. Matternet proposed an automated, Internet-inspired drone network to deliver goods in cities or medicine to poor rural areas seasonally cut off by flooded road.
Buy Your Next 3D Printer…at Staples?
Staples announced it would offer the $1,300 3D Systems Cube desktop 3D printer, while other firms introduced cheap (or free) 3D scanners. Is 3D printing poised to go mainstream? Autodesk CEO Carl Bass cautioned against the hype but went on to say, “Just as rip-mix-burn became the anthem for digital music, we are starting to do the same thing for the physical world with capture-modify-print (or download-modify-print)…”
High energy physics researchers still rely on the concept that it is the nucleus of the photon that they must isolate in order to measure (observe) the particle.
The nucleus is only a “concentration” of “some” of the energy.
When this concentration becomes enough to be detected, it has already formed a stable structure complete with polarity and field lines.
The particle’s field lines are comprised of “the same” energy; only smaller… As is the nucleus.
If you are looking for the nucleus of a photon, you immediately run into a problem. Your assumption asserts that the photon’s existence is contained within it’s nucleus. It is not.
A piece of energy, or a particle is comprised of many smaller, individual, pieces of the same energy. The nucleus is only a concentration of the energy, and is only “part” of the atomic structure of the photon.
All interaction, with any part of this structure, will cause interference, if forced into a frame of reference. Since the photon is a “sum of it’s parts,” any attempt (accidental or otherwise) to reference just the nucleus will fail, and any point that is detected will reference the entire piece of energy as if it were in that location.
By: Richard L. Brown
October 2, 2013
Sedition is defined as an illegal action inciting resistance to lawful authority with the intent of causing the disruption of government. Considered a subversive act, it often includes subversion of a constitution and incitement of discontent (or resistance) to lawful authority. The intent to “overthrow the government” is not a required element of the charge.
In 1798 the United States stood on the brink of war with France. The Federalists believed that Democratic-Republican criticism of Federalist policies was disloyal and feared that aliens living in the United States would sympathize with the French during a war.
Directed against Democratic-Republicans, of the time, a series of bills were passed by the Federalist Congress in 1798 and signed into law by President Adams. The most controversial of the new laws was the Sedition Act. It permitted strong government control over individual actions, and was in essence, an act that prohibited public opposition to the government. Fines and imprisonment could be used against those who “write, print, utter, or publish . . . any false, scandalous and malicious writing” against the government.
When Democratic-Republicans in some states refused to enforce federal laws, such as the Whiskey tax, and threatened to rebel, Federalists threatened to send the army to force them to capitulate
SUBVERSIVE POLITICAL ACTION – “A planned series of activities designed to accomplish political objectives by influencing, dominating, or displacing individuals or groups who are so placed as to affect the decisions and actions of a government.” Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms. US Department of Defense 2005.
Under the laws of the United States, to betray a sworn oath of office, may be considered “treason,” “sedition,” or a “high crime”
History also shows that these “suspensions” of civil liberty’s were soon afterward removed, as they were only required to be in place due to the distracting influence of the time. When we look at the wordings, what Speaker Boehner and his allies are doing, seems to fit into the definition of perfectly. If this is in fact true. Then the definitions should, and I believe will, mirror the actions and accusations being compared to, and against them.
That said…, if we now agree that their intent, and actions meet the definition proposed; “Sedition,”
Then, we as citizens would be honor bound to discuss this amongst each other in an attempt to verify it’s validity.
Argue it’s merits amongst each other in an attempt to reach a quorum,
If the quorum is in agreement, present an accusation and demand that charges be proffered.
I was just thinking about how the Human race could itself be on a course towards a “Singularity.”
I’ve made the comment many times before, that “we are at a time when changes in morals, values, and ethics are at an all time high for our species.”
At no other time in history, have we gone through so many different changes in sociological and psychological belief systems at one time.
Evolutionary change is apparent in our species as we attempt to adapt o the environment that is being created around us.
If we now look at things this way, isn’t it a bit more apparent how some of these might be related?
The world communicated for history very slowly. As such, neither did MVE’s. (When everyone lives in the same communities, raising the same kids, etc, values and traditions are handed down. These traditions and values will typically be reflected in the behaviors of the larger group. (or the species in Darwinian evolution)
Only when the larger group “needs” the change, (unless isolated) the individual desires will be suppressed and therefore largely unchanged. ( Edit/cont. – What is done in privacy against these …. )
If however, the group DOES need for the MVE systems to change, they will.Let’s look at an example. When “population needs raise, so drops the age of marriage.
But I want to mention the Singularity connection.
In this, one might look at the numbers of changes within numbers of generations.
Ie: How many (and on what level) MVE changes have gone on within a society as a whole, and how many generations did it take for the change to occur. (Ie: The acceptance of homosexual behavior.)
If we take today
…”But we must realize that the fields around an electron, as well as all around
other matter are actually two opposing bowl shaped electromagnetic fields.
Unless we properly understand this basic magnetic field structure,
we will never be able to properly understand the fundamental forces of matter
from the sub-atomic to the galactic.” David LaPoint